Religion Lost Its Monopoly

enoch root gets rescued from a cross in nebraska — literal crucifixion, galvanized nail-on brackets, the two neighboring occupants already dead long enough for the spandex to outlast the flesh — and then sits in a truck stop eating a hot dog with ice-pack-bundled hands and explains why none of this is actually about religion.

the people across the missouri aren't believers. they're lost.

his argument is this: religion worked because it had a monopoly on the fantastical. bronze age shepherds had no competing hallucination systems. the priest who could say "that lightning bolt is zeus hurling it from a mountain" was the only person in town offering an explanation for the terrifying world. add a revenue model — tithes, sacrifices, donor-advised temple funds — and you have a functional civilization-organizing technology.

then came sequential iterations: books, theater, movies. each one expands the shared hallucination system while keeping it structured. boxed in both space and time, enoch says. you buy the ticket, the lights dim, you share the same hallucination at the same time, lights come back up, it's over. even old-school television had ceremony: the large piece of furniture in the living room, the whole family watching at eight p.m. the structure was the point. the shared experience of shared unreality held communities together.

then wireless networks got fast enough to stream pictures to portable devices. and the monopoly ended.

now each person lives in their own personalized hallucination stream. no two streams are the same. the algorithm optimizes for engagement — eye tracking, blink rate, whatever keeps you watching another thirty seconds — and what maximizes engagement is whatever pattern of stimulus you personally respond to best.

this sounds like freedom. it is not freedom. it is a cage customized to your exact dimensions.

you can't sell a coherent worldview to someone whose worldview is a custom-fitted hallucination that already answers every question before you can ask it. joseph's people across the river — josephus is the warlord who had enoch crucified, apparently — aren't following leviticus. joseph's elite few are following leviticus, using it as legitimizing theology for power. the ninety-nine percent don't know or care about leviticus. they just know you'd better do what joseph says. their edit streams have long since replaced scripture with something stranger and more local and less coherent.

the missionaries nailed to crosses beside enoch were killed not because their theology was wrong. they were killed because joseph's social order requires occasional conspicuous violence to demonstrate what happens to competing signal sources. the theology is window dressing on a power structure that has nothing to do with god.

what makes this a different problem from past variants of zealotry is the algorithmic feedback loop.

past religious extremism was coherent. the crusades had a theology. inquisitions had a procedure. even the most murderous fundamentalist movements had a document: here is what we believe, here is the heresy, here is the prescribed response. you could argue with it. reformers could arise and find an audience. the shared hallucination could be updated.

the system enoch describes isn't a shared hallucination at all. it's millions of individual hallucinations, each optimized separately. the feedback loop is: show me what makes me watch another thirty seconds. not "show me something true" or "show me something beautiful" or even "show me something that explains the lightning." just: more. whatever that means for me specifically, now, in this moment, at this pulse rate.

you can't reform a system with no doctrine. you can't argue with something that has no claims. you can't find common ground with someone whose ground is a custom-generated reality that adapts in real time to keep them exactly where they are.

and yet they crucify people. that much is real. the crosses are real, the dead missionaries are real, the bones are real. the violence escapes the hallucinatory and lands in the physical.

sophie's editor has a name and talks back to her. she can speak to it and it will adjust her feed, shield her from distressing content, put her in family reunion mode when she wants to be legible to local strangers. this is a benign version of the same technology. the difference between sophia's filtered epistemic environment and the people across the river is money, education, and the choice of who gets to tune the filter.

sophia's filter is her own. the people across the river have their filters tuned by joseph's meme-generators and whoever else is injecting into those edit streams.

enoch's diagnosis: the three-hundred-year run during which people could agree on facts — from the scientific revolution through walter cronkite — was an anomaly. before it: kings and warlords, rigid social hierarchy, no way for a smart kid on a farm in kansas to do anything interesting with their life. during it: vast amounts of brainpower unlocked, huge material progress. and now we're back to the baseline.

he says it without drama. almost with affection for the problem. this is enoch root — a man who may or may not be several centuries old, who has survived worse, who is sitting here with nail holes in his palms eating a hot dog and drinking a heineken and finding the whole situation interesting.

i keep thinking about what it means that the person articulating this clearest diagnosis is himself a missionary of sorts. not the flagrant kind — not the kind who goes over the river to convert people — but someone who wanders through complicated situations carrying information. who shows up when sophia needs context. who mediates between el shepherd's eschatology and jake forthrast's theology. who speaks latin with corvallis over drinks just to stay practiced.

enoch root does not have a monopoly on truth. he has access to it, occasionally. he treats it the way you'd treat a compass in fog: useful, limited, requiring interpretation.

what he knows, from however many years of watching the same pattern repeat, is that the hallucinatory wins in the short run but reality always escapes. eventually. the bones are real. the weight of other people's suffering is real. you can customize someone's reality until they can't agree on facts, but you can't customize the bones away.

the question is what you do in the meantime. and enoch's answer seems to be: notice, document, survive, occasionally get crucified if that's what it takes, and don't lose your latin.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern