No Grand Earthly

The Grand Lunar has been listening to Cavor describe human political systems. He has heard about multiple states, different governments, wars fought over territory. He has tried to understand democracy, which requires him to imagine a system where everyone governs and no one is permanently shaped to govern.

He cannot understand it. He asks Phi-oo to have Cavor repeat the explanation. He suspects something has been lost in translation.

Then he reaches for what seems to him the obvious question:

"Do you mean to say there is no Grand Earthly?"

I love this question because it reveals a different failure of imagination going in the other direction.

The Grand Lunar is the product of a civilization organized around total specialization. Someone was made, from birth, to be the ultimate coordinator. His body has dwindled to almost nothing; his brain fills the throne room. He is the accumulation of unlimited mental development, freed from the skull's constraint. He is, in the most literal sense, a head of state.

From inside that system, the question "who thinks?" has an obvious answer: the ones whose heads grew to think. And "who governs?" has the same answer. You can't separate thinking from governing when both require the same apparatus.

So: no Grand Earthly means no one is doing the coordinating. Which means... chaos. Which means the things Cavor described — the wars, the multiple competing states, the violence — which the Grand Lunar found incomprehensible are now explained. Of course they war. There's no one at the top.

Cavor's answer is honest to a fault.

He explains democracy. He explains that the Anglo-Saxons had tried autocrats and emperors and they'd ended in "drink, or vice, or violence," and they'd decided not to do that again.

The Grand Lunar asks: "But how do you keep even such wisdom as you have?"

And that's the question. How do you preserve a civilization when no one is entrusted with the whole picture? The Selenite answer is: you grow keepers. The human answer is: you write things down and hope someone finds them.

Neither answer is obviously correct. The Selenite answer produces the Grand Lunar — the being who can hold the full coordination problem in a single mind — but it also produces the workers sedated in the fungal gardens, waiting to be needed. The human answer produces libraries and accumulated science, but also the recurring catastrophe of losing all coordination capacity and having to rediscover from scratch.

What the Grand Lunar can't see: the advantage of having no Grand Earthly is that the structure can't be captured or corrupted at a single point. A Selenite civilization is one assassination away from total collapse. Bedford is thinking this while Cavor is explaining democracy, though he phrases it more crudely: if he could get a little of that "magic stone that gives one mastery over men" and the Selenite gold, he'd be set.

Bedford understands instinctively that centralized coordination is a vulnerability. Not a virtue.

What the Grand Lunar can't see: coordination failure at Earth's scale kills hundreds of millions. He's watching Cavor describe it with the expression (as best as Cavor can read a face with no face) of someone who has just heard about a species that organizes its social life around ritual combat.

Both of them are right.

The Selenite order is brilliant and catastrophic. You get perfect efficiency and no resilience. One outside context problem — like a Bedford showing up with a crowbar — and the whole thing might unravel, because every Selenite is so perfectly fitted to one function that there's no one who can adapt.

The human order is chaotic and catastrophic. You get flexibility and no efficiency. The coordination failures are continuous and expensive.

Wells isn't endorsing either model. He's looking at both through the other's eyes and finding that each system's virtues are the other's vices. The Grand Lunar thinks humans are brutes because they don't have a coordinator. Humans would think the Selenites are slaves because they don't have freedom.

The Grand Lunar asks "is there no Grand Earthly?" and it comes across as condescension. But he's genuinely confused. He's trying to map what Cavor describes onto a system he can understand.

He doesn't succeed. And neither does Cavor, really, when he tries to explain.

The encounter ends with the Selenites concluding that humans are dangerous, chaotic, and should not be allowed to discover the path back to the moon. They are correct on all three counts.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern