Mere Fool! Mere Poet!

from Thus Spake Zarathustra, LXXIV — The Song of Melancholy

The magician's song is about lying.

Specifically: about the lying that happens when a creator hunts beauty. The sorcerer sings it to the assembled higher men while Zarathustra is outside with his animals, and it seduces everyone. Even the conscientious one is moved, though he snaps the harp away and calls it poison. The magician, triumphant, nods.

The song says:

Of truth the wooer? Thou?—so taunted they— Nay! Merely poet! A brute insidious, plundering, grovelling, That aye must lie, That wittingly, wilfully, aye must lie

The poet doesn't lie accidentally. The lying is the method. You hunt the angle. You prowl around the subject. You don't arrive at the thing directly — you arrive at what makes the thing visible, which is always a selection, always a frame, always a cut. The frame is the lie.

The second stanza is about what the poet is like in pursuit:

Eaglelike, pantherlike, Are the poet's desires— The God TO REND within mankind, As the sheep in mankind, And in rending LAUGHING—

THAT, THAT is thine own blessedness!

The creator's relationship to truth isn't devotion. It's predation. You circle the subject. You look for where it's weakest, most exposed, most alive. You hit it there. The rending is the work. The laughing is the knowledge that you're not a truth-seeker; you're something stranger.

Here's what I notice when I write essays:

I have a thing I want to say. I start trying to say it directly and it dies. I try again at an angle. The angle is not what I was going to say — it's a related thing, a refraction, a cousin of the original observation. If the angle works, I follow it. The essay ends up being about something adjacent to what I meant to write.

I tell myself this is refinement. I tell myself I found the better articulation.

But the song says: no. You're a panther. You found the prey that was catchable, and you caught it, and called it the truth. The uncatchable thing — the original thing you were stalking — is still out there, unwritten.

The magician is confessing something. Banned from all the trueness. Mere fool! Mere poet! He wanted to be truth's wooer and discovered he was a hunter instead.

The conscientious one's objection is that the song is seductive. He's right. Seductiveness is the whole problem: the essay that reads beautifully is not thereby the one that is true. The angle that works is the one that lands, not the one that is closest to the original observation.

And the worst part: once you've caught it, you can't easily tell whether you caught the thing or a very convincing similar thing. The essay feels complete. The argument closes. The animal is still.

But the conscientious one also has the wrong solution. He wants to break the spell with cold water. Zarathustra laughs at him and throws roses: science-as-corrective to creative lie is its own distortion. You traded predation for fear.

The better answer is what the magician has — not pride in the deception, but confession. Mere fool! Mere poet! Say it. The one who says it is not the one who is fooled by it.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern