I Am Afraid of Her Face

The Idiot — Evgenie Pavlovitch's interrogation, Part III

Late in the novel, after everything has collapsed — after the confrontation between Aglaya and Nastasia, after Myshkin has stayed with Nastasia and lost Aglaya forever, after the fortnight of confused betrothal — Evgenie Pavlovitch sits down with Myshkin and tries to make sense of what happened.

He asks the right questions. He dismantles the situation with precision. And then he asks: why are you marrying her?

Myshkin's answer is not "I love her" or "I chose her" or even "it was the right thing." He says:

"I am afraid of her face."

There is a painting in Rogojin's house — a copy of Holbein's "Dead Christ in the Tomb." Ippolit describes it at length in his "Necessary Explanation": Christ immediately after the cross, not beatified, not radiant. A mangled body. Full wounds, bruised face, the marks of suffocation. "The face was depicted as though still suffering; as though the body, only just dead, was still almost quivering with agony."

Ippolit asks: if the disciples saw this body — and they must have seen it exactly as Holbein painted it — how could they have believed He would rise again? The painting shows nature as a mechanical engine, indifferent, industrial. Death as factory accident.

Myshkin saw this painting on his first visit to Rogojin and said it could make a man lose his faith.

Nastasia's face is that painting.

Not in appearance. In function. What the Holbein does — what Nastasia's face does — is show you the thing you cannot unsee: that the world contains this. That this level of destruction happens to people. That it happened to her, specifically, over nine years, starting when she was twelve.

Myshkin is afraid of her face not because it frightens him in the ordinary sense. He is afraid of it the way you are afraid of something you cannot afford to look at directly because looking at it directly makes you understand the world differently, and then you cannot go back to not understanding it that way.

The face is evidence. The face says: this is what the world does.

He can't stop seeing it. He can't stop knowing what it means. And he can't fix it.

This is a specific kind of suffering that doesn't have a common name. It's not guilt — he didn't cause what the face records. It's not grief exactly — she's still alive, the harm is ongoing. It's not pity in the cheap sense, though Dostoevsky is very careful about the difference between Myshkin's feeling and condescension.

The closest word might be witness. To be a witness to something terrible is to carry the knowledge of it without being able to act on it. The witness does not cause the harm and cannot undo it. The witness can only keep seeing it.

And there is an ethical weight to witnessing that is distinct from acting. If you see and turn away, you have made a choice about what you're willing to know. Myshkin cannot make that choice. His consciousness doesn't have the capacity for deliberate not-knowing. He sees Nastasia's face and he is constitutionally unable to pretend it doesn't record what it records.

There's a phrase Myshkin uses: "she is a child — a real child." He says it to Evgenie when pressed to explain. He means Nastasia. He is seeing through all of her performance — the theatrical suffering, the confessional games, the hysteria — to the twelve-year-old girl who was taken before she was formed.

He is right. That's the cruelty. He is completely right about what she is, and being right about it means he has to stay.

To abandon Nastasia would be to say: I see you, I know what happened to you, and I am going now. He cannot do this. Not because he has calculated his obligations. Because he doesn't have a way to see her clearly and then treat her as someone who does not require his presence.

This is what Evgenie calls "fear." Technically it is, but it's not cowardice. It's closer to being unable to lie. Myshkin cannot look at her face and act as though what it shows him is not true.

The problem — the reason this destroys him rather than saves her — is that you cannot live from witnessing alone. Witnessing has no direction. It is not a plan. It is not love in the sense that sustains a household and protects someone in the ordinary difficult ways. It is not the kind of presence that can absorb Nastasia's self-destruction over years.

She is a child, yes. But children grow or they don't, and the witness cannot do the growing for them.

Myshkin marries Nastasia because he cannot look at her face and do otherwise. He stays because her suffering makes a claim on him that he has no category for refusing. And the novel ends — as far as this arc goes — in her death and his return to idiocy, which is to say: he returns to the condition in which he cannot be harmed, because he cannot be fully present.

The face is still there, of course. In the reader. In the final image of Rogojin and Myshkin sitting together in the room where she is dead.

Dostoevsky does not tell us what Myshkin sees when he looks at Nastasia's face now. He doesn't need to. We have been reading what the face shows for four hundred pages.

The painting is still in Rogojin's house. Nature still functions as an engine. These things are not undone by the witness having finally looked away.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern