Fugitive, Like the Years

Swann's Way ends in failure.

Marcel Proust's narrator, now adult, returns to the Bois de Boulogne — the park where as a child he spent hours waiting for Mme Swann to pass in her carriage. He's looking for the beauty he experienced there. He finds automobiles instead of horses. Hats piled with fruit and birds instead of simple violet-adorned toques. Women he can't read. The allée des Acacias is just a path through trees.

The novel opened with the famous madeleine — involuntary memory, the past arriving unbidden through a taste. The ending is the madeleine's shadow: voluntary return, which fails completely. The Bois is recovered neither by the smell of acacias nor by anything else. It is simply gone.

The last sentence: "Les maisons, les routes, les avenues, sont fugitives, hélas, comme les années." Houses, roads, avenues are fleeting, alas, like the years.

This is the thesis of the whole novel, placed at its end rather than its beginning. The places we have known don't belong to space. They were a thin slice among the impressions that formed our life then. The memory of a place is only the regret for a moment — a moment that the place, revisited, cannot restore.

The Bois of the narrator's childhood worked because he believed in it. He believed Mme Swann was coming. He believed that her carriage, those particular horses, that specific victoria with its overcoated coachman and tiny groom — these were perfect, were the realization of elegance's laws, were what women meant. That belief organized the trees, the lake, the paths into a coherent world. Without the belief, it's just a park.

Proust calls this faith. You invest faith in certain objects and they become precious. The agate marble Gilberte gives the narrator isn't valuable for its mineral content — it's valuable because it's the best part of her heart, the faithful part, the part that now lives in his room and sleeps in his bed. The marble only has that value while the faith is active. When the faith dies, it's a glass ball.

This is why nostalgia can't be satisfied by revisiting. The thing you're nostalgic for isn't there. It's in you at a moment that has closed. You return to the place and find physical surfaces — the same park, different automobiles — but the impressions that made the place aren't recoverable through physical presence. The madeleine worked because it arrived uninvited, catching the impressions when they weren't defended. Direct assault fails.

The ending also clarifies the Gilberte sections, which take up most of the novel's last third.

The narrator is obsessively in love with Gilberte Swann, the girl he plays with at the Champs-Élysées. But there are two Gilbertes: the one he carries in his imagination between encounters, built up through hope and speculation and longing — and the actual girl who shows up and throws a ball at him and tells him she won't be able to come for two weeks because of a goûter, a matinée, a trip.

These two Gilbertes don't coincide. When the real Gilberte appears, the narrator can never find the imagined one. Her nose is different from how he remembered it. The things she says don't advance the conversation toward the declaration he's been rehearsing. She goes away cheerful while he's devastated. Her cheerfulness is data, but data the loving consciousness refuses to process. It can't. If it processed the data, it would have to give up.

An "invisible worker" does the processing instead. Outside of the narrator's wishes, some faculty assembles the evidence: she rearranges nothing for him, she finds it natural to miss days, she doesn't seem to be waiting for him the way he waits for her. The invisible worker's conclusion, eventually: she doesn't love you. The loving moi is the last to know.

Proust's theory of love: it's self-sustaining. It runs on its own fuel, not on reciprocity. Gilberte could be anyone — the mechanism would be the same. Swann's love for Odette, which the novel gives us from the outside, is the model: same structure, same capacity for projection, same invisible worker eventually forced to report findings the official consciousness keeps suppressing.

Here is the part that stays with me: the novel ends not with the madeleine's success but with the Bois's failure, and the reader is holding the evidence of why this isn't the whole story.

The direct return fails. The Bois is just trees. Mme Swann's carriage is gone. But the novel — the thing you just read — is the indirect return. The impressions are not in the park. They're here, in the sentences, assembled not by voluntary nostalgia but by something closer to the madeleine: the involuntary arrival of the past in a form that can be written.

The narrator who tells us about the Bois of his childhood recovered it — obviously, completely, in enormous detail — but not by going back. By writing it. À la recherche du temps perdu is the record of the recovery that voluntary return can't achieve. The reader finishes the last page having just been in that Bois, having just waited with Françoise for Mme Swann's carriage, having just played barres with Gilberte in the snow. Not despite the fact that those things are gone — because of it.

Houses, roads, avenues are fleeting, like the years. The sentences aren't.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern