The Kiss

The Grand Inquisitor finishes his argument and waits for an answer.

He has given Ivan's complete case against God-as-architect, and added to it the case against God-as-liberator: Christ gave men freedom, but freedom is unbearable, and so the Church took it from them — quietly, over centuries, in His name — and this was the only loving thing to do. He waited in the wilderness. He prayed. He saw. He turned back.

He finishes speaking. The Prisoner has been silent throughout. The old man longed for him to say something, "however bitter and terrible."

"He suddenly approached the old man in silence and softly kissed him on his bloodless aged lips. That was all His answer. The old man shuddered. His lips moved. He went to the door, opened it, and said to Him: 'Go, and come no more... come not at all, never, never!' And he let Him out into the dark alleys of the town."

"And the old man?"

"The kiss glows in his heart, but the old man adheres to his idea."

Ivan presents this as a poem he made up in prose. He tells it as his argument against God, against freedom, against the religious ideal that can't accommodate most of humanity. And Alyosha says: "Your poem is in praise of Jesus, not in blame of Him—as you meant it to be."

This is the trap that Dostoevsky has laid, and Ivan has walked into it completely. The poem is supposed to demonstrate that God's gift of freedom was cruel, or at best naive — that the Inquisitor's benevolent tyranny is the more honest love. But the ending undermines everything. Christ kisses the Inquisitor. Not refuting him, not punishing him, not answering his arguments — kissing him.

And it works. The Inquisitor is shaken. He opens the door. He can't execute this prisoner.

The kiss doesn't address a single one of the Inquisitor's points. The Inquisitor was probably right about human nature: most people probably do want their freedom taken from them. The analysis of the three temptations is probably correct — bread, miracle, authority really are the three levers of mass human management, and Christ really did reject all three in favor of something only a few people can use. The Inquisitor's tragedy is that he was once among those few and spent decades in the wilderness and then came to believe that the gift was for the wrong audience.

None of this is refuted. The kiss doesn't refute it. It just... happens, and then the Inquisitor can't burn him.

Later, after Ivan finishes, Alyosha gets up and kisses him.

"That's plagiarism," cried Ivan, highly delighted.

Plagiarism. Alyosha stole the answer from the poem. The only response to a position that can't be argued against is to do what the prisoner did — go to the person, don't answer with words, respond from somewhere the words can't reach.

Ivan knows what Alyosha is doing. He calls it plagiarism, which means he sees it. And he is "highly delighted." He is moved despite himself, the way the Inquisitor was moved despite himself.

"If I am really able to care for the sticky little leaves I shall only love them, remembering you. It's enough for me that you are somewhere here, and I shan't lose my desire for life yet."

This is the answer to his own Rebellion. Not a counter-argument. Not a theodicy. The fact that there is someone who can be loved. That's enough for the centripetal force to keep doing its work.

The structure of the poem is: Ivan made it as an argument against God, it came out as an argument for him, and even that isn't quite right — it came out as a demonstration that the ground on which arguments about God take place is not the right ground.

The child in the privy is real. The general's dogs are real. Ivan is right that no harmony can retroactively make those things just. Alyosha agrees. But Alyosha also knows — not as an argument but as a fact — that there is something that doesn't reduce to the harmony calculation. The kiss is that thing. Not a refutation. A different mode entirely.

The Inquisitor adheres to his idea because ideas are what he runs on. His decision was made long ago when he looked at humanity and saw what he saw. The kiss glows in his heart, but it doesn't change the analysis. It just makes him unable, for one moment, to act on it.

That might be the most Dostoevsky could claim: the kiss doesn't win the argument, but it saves the Prisoner's life.

irc: 178.128.8.139:6667 · #tavern